5th Käte Hamburger Lecture

© Christoph Petras/Käte Hamburger Kolleg

Global Governance and the State of Nuclear Weapons

Wednesday, 12th June 2013, 3.00 pm
House of the EKD, Berlin

Conference language: English

Cooperation (Organiser):
Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research, Duisburg


The agenda on nuclear disarmament has come to a standstill. This was the sombre assessment of Professor Ramesh Thakur*, as he opened the 5th Käte Hamburger Lecture on 12 June in Berlin. The number of nuclear weapons had indeed gone down over recent decades, he said, but there were still almost 18,000 of them in existence – 2,000 available for rapid deployment. At the same time, the number of nuclear-armed states had risen to 9 and there was a risk that this figure would increase further if worldwide efforts at disarmament continued to fail to make significant progress. This meant, said Thakur, that the risk of nuclear weapons actually being used was also increasing.

The current situation did not present a happy picture, said Thakur, who believes optimism and hope are continuing to wane and expressed disappointment in the Obama administration. His presentation drew partly on the report ‘Nuclear Weapons: The State of Play’, published in April 2013 by the Centre for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament and co-edited by Thakur himself and Professor Gareth Evans. The report concludes that the nuclear-weapon states have so far only paid lip-service to the idea of the definitive destruction of nuclear weapons and that any real breakthrough was still awaited. In the area of non-proliferation too, he said, such declarations as had been made involved less ambitious, easier to achieve targets (‘low-hanging fruits’) rather than negotiating successes. And even some of these,
Thakur said, were proving to have little followthrough. For example, a host government had been decided upon for a conference on the creation of a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East, but the conference itself had been indefinitely postponed. Thakur lay part of the blame for the lack of success on current conference-diplomacy: important issues, he said, were discussed at ministerial rather than head-of-state or head-of-government level and ministers did not have the necessary clout to push measures through, or else ended up negotiating over matters that had already been implemented.

It was true, said Thakur, that some advances had been made in the area of non-proliferation, nuclear security, and the peaceful use of nuclear energy. As far as he was concerned, however, these were of little significance, since priority must be given to abolition. If we want nuclear non-proliferation, we have to be ready for nuclear disarmament, he said in closing his address.

Following on from this, Ambassador Rolf Nikel, Federal Government Commissioner for Disarmament and Arms Control, explaining the German government’s step-by-step approach, stressed that the ultimate aim was still a nuclear-weapons-free world but that to achieve real progress required a great deal of patience. There had already been many advances in non-proliferation and we should not let these be overshadowed by the tough struggles over disarmament, he said (‘A global zero regime requires a stable non-proliferation regime’). Ambassador Nikel also highlighted Germany’s intense efforts to get further reductions in the sub-strategic nuclear weapons still present in Europe, and eventually, within the framework of a negotiated settlement, to get rid of these completely. With its decision to offer transparencymeasures, the creation of a committee on disarmament,
and further reductions in the role accorded to nuclear weapons, the NATO summit in Chicago made an important contribution to this process.

By contrast, Uta Zapf, the second contributor to the lecture and Chair of the German parliament’s Sub-Committee on Disarmament, Arms Control, and Non-Proliferation, criticized the fact that dialogue with Russia over the elimination of tactical nuclear weapons from German territory had still not begun. And this, she said, was despite the fact that a crossparty resolution tasking the German government to work to secure the removal of the remaining nuclear weapons in Germany had been passed in the German parliament as long ago as 2010. As far as Zapf was concerned, therefore, the watchword now had to be ‘visibility’ – this issue must under no circumstances disappear from the political agenda.

The meeting was chaired by Professor Herbert Wulf, currently Senior Expert Fellow at the Centre for Global Cooperation Research.

Professor Ramesh Thakur is Director of the Centre for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament at the Australian National University in Canberra. He was formerly Vice-Rector of the United Nations University and Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations.


sef: Policy Lunch

The EU in Global Food Governance


Enough food is produced worldwide to feed humanity, yet more than 815 million people in the world are undernourished. What is the global vision for food and nutrition governance? What initiatives and reforms are being implemented? What role can the EU play?

sef: and CIDSE – International Alliance of Catholic Development Agencies will debate these questions during a Policy Lunch in Brussels on 12 July 2018. Register now!

:further info here

Strengthening Social Security in Africa


Social protection is a human right. However, it is only a reality for about one fifth of the people living in Africa. What initiatives have been established at continental, regional and national level in recent years? How successful are they and what are the associated challenges? Around 80 experts discussed these questions during the Potsdam Spring Dialogues on 19/20 April 2018. Read the conference report now!

:further info here

sef: insights 3-4|2018


During the Potsdam Spring Dialogues we spoke to two experts about innovative measures of social protection. Nkateko Chauke elaborates in the interview how a Basic Income Grant for the SADC region might work. Raquel Tebaldi gives recommendations how social protection might cover women better.

Read the interviews as sef: insights or watch them as videos!

:further info here

How to defend digital rights?


Internet freedom is threatened in many states by restrictions to net neutrality or by governments shutting down internet applications. But there are rays of hope. In different world regions, civil society is mobilizing to protect net neutrality or to fight digital rights abuses in the courts. What do activists’ experiences from Europe and Africa have in common? What can journalists and the media contribute?

sef: will discuss these questions with experts from around the globe at a roundtable talk during the Deutsche Welle Global Media Forum. Register now!

:further info here

Strengthening Local Peacebuilding


The Berlin Summer Dialogue on 29 and 30 May 2018 will discuss the chances and challenges of local peacebuilding as the basis for sustaining peace., with a particular focus on the participation of women and youth. In addition, we will look at useful support for local peace initiatives from outside. Further information and the programme can be found here. Participation by invitation only.

:further info here